Indiana University School of Social Work
S352: Social Services Delivery Systems

(3 Credit Hours)

Section: R099 Dr. Bob Vernon
Semester: Spring 2001 Office: ES 4149
Time: 5:45-8:25 Hours: M&T: 4:00-5:00
Day: Monday Office: 274-6717
Room: ES 2127 Email: rvernon@iupui.edu
Website: http://members.home.net/humanservicesmedia/index.htm

 

Course Description

The Social Welfare Policy and Services course builds on S251 by exploring in depth the current social welfare delivery system through policy analysis using a variety of frameworks and the development of policy practice skills. Social welfare is understood as a front-line needs-meeting system designed to address a wide range of human needs in a complex society. Working primarily within formal organizations in delivering social services, generalist practitioners need to understand how global, national, state and local agency policies affect the delivery of services to persons in local communities. This course is designed to develop policy analysis skills so that students will be able to identify gaps in the service delivery system and inequitable or oppressive aspects of current policy delivery. The course also develops beginning policy practice skills so that students will know how to work toward social change congruent with social work ethics and the profession's commitment to social and economic justice.

 

Course Objectives

As a result of having completed the requirements of this course, the student will be able to:

1. Analyze social welfare policies and delivery systems using different frameworks.

2. Analyze basic policy making processes and the social work role in these processes including the use of advocacy and empowerment.

3. Describe the roles and relationships of governments, businesses and the not for profit sector in the provision of human services.

4. Analyze the influence of politics, economics and cultural and social values in the development and implementation of social policy decisions.

5. Analyze how perspectives on race, ethnicity, gender, class and age influence decisions about the design, organization and operation of social service delivery systems.

6. Analyze how social service programs are designed to serve populations that differ by race, ethnicity, gender, class, age, etc.

7. Analyze the relationship between social work values and beliefs, current delivery systems, and current social policy issues.

8. Evaluate social policy vis-a-vis social work's commitment to social and economic justice and the processes of systemic change, with special attention to the situation of minorities, people of color, women, gay men and lesbian women, and other populations at risk.

9. Evaluate the impact of social policies and programs on individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities

10. Use a broad array of beginning policy practice skills to initiate and attempt to influence the development of social policy within agencies and the broader community.

11. Analyze the impact of social policies on social workers and agencies.

12. Analyze the use of technology in social policy development.

Required Textbook

Jansson, Bruce J. (1999). Becoming and Effective Policy Advocate, 3rd Edition

Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole

Outline of Content and Readings

 

Week 1- January 9

Welcome and introduction to the course.

Week 2 - January 16

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 1: Why Engage in Policy Practice?
Chapter 2: Ethical, Rational and Political Rationales

Week 3 - January 23

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 3: A Policy Practice Framework

Week 4 – January 30

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 4: The Big Picture

Week 5 – February 6

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 5: Building Agendas

Due: URLs for Advocacy in Indiana

Week 6 - February 13

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 6: Analyzing Problems

Week 7 - February 20

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 7: Finding Policy Options

FEBRUARY 21: LOBBY DAY!
VISIT:
http://iussw.iupui.edu/advocacy/advocacy.htm

 

Week 8 - February 27

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 8: Writing Policy Proposals

Lobby Day reaction papers are due!

Week 9 – March 6

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 9: Policy Persuasion

Midterm examination is due no later than 12:00 PM, Friday, March 9.

Week 10 - March 13

No Class: Spring Break!

Week 11 - March 20

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 10: Understanding Power and Politics

Week 12 - March 27

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 11: Developing and Using Power

Position Proposals are due!

Week 13 – April 3

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 12: Developing Political Strategy

Week 14 - April 10

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 13: Putting Political Strategy into Action

Read:

Week 15 - April 17

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 14: Securing the Implementation of Policies

Week 16 - April 24

Read:

Jansson, Chapter 15: Assessing Policy Implementation

Grant proposals are due!

Week 17 - May 1

Grant review simulation, wrap-up.

Finals Week: May 8

Final examination is due no later than 12:00 PM, Friday, May 4.

 

 

Conduct of Course and Assignments

The course is taught in a lecture/discussion format. There are several different assignments

1. URLs for Advocacy in Indiana (100 points)

The Web provides many resources for policy practice. Unfortunately, finding appropriate websites is, for many people, a search for a needle in a Nebraska's worth of haystacks. To help this class provide a resource for itself, participants at the Lobby Day event, and as a general service to the greater community, the class will produce an annotated listing of websites that are appropriate for policy practice in Indiana. The list will be made available on the Lobby Day website and students will get citation credit for their part in this publication. Details will be made available in class.

For examples of annotated websites visit "Shirley's List" at: http://kml.uindy.edu/resources/socialwork/index.html

2. Lobby Day Reaction Paper (50 points)

Students will write a two-page reaction paper that describes their activities, observations and critical insights at the Lobby Day event.

3. Position Proposal (200 points)

This assignment you to become more familiar with policy-advocacy issues surrounding an area of your own curiosity or interest. In addition, the assignment is intended to foster a beginning knowledge of how policies can be created or reviewed as advocacy for various client systems. 

 

The paper should resemble a working final draft of a policy proposal that could be submitted to the NASW Delegate Assembly for debate, consideration and possible adoption. This includes an executive summary plus separate background, issue and policy statements. In essence, you are creating a position paper for our own profession, although this could easily be generalized towards lobbying efforts with other organizations and political units.

You may choose any topic of interest as long as there is a social work policy dimension. If you select a topic for which an actual NASW Delegate Assembly policy statement exists, you must narrow and refine it further, perhaps for a specific cultural group or population at risk.

Excerpt Examples from Social Work Speaks, 5th Edition:. NASW Policy Statements, 2000-2003. NASW Press, will be made available. Students are urged to follow these as models for this paper.

4. Grant Proposal (250 points)

Teams of two students will write a draft proposal for funding a project or program as a response to policy practice and advocacy. The grant proposal will follow the basic outline provided by the Foundation Center at: http://fdncenter.org/onlib/shortcourse/prop1.html

 

In addition, students will provide the names of two foundations likely to fund the proposal and justify this decision through on-line investigation of sources. Teams may write on any population at risk or diverse group. This proposal may be an extension of the position paper assignment.

5. Examinations (400 points in total)

There are two examinations for the course: a midterm and a final. The midterm exam covers about one half of the course materials and includes readings, lectures, class discussions, and films. The final exam will be given during finals week. It will be similar to the midterm but limited to materials studied in the last half of the course after the midterm. Both exams will be online or take-home in format, open book, and a combination of short answer and essay questions. You may earn up to 200 points on each exam, 400 in total.

 

Course Policies

1. Students are expected to have completed the assigned materials from the course outline by the beginning of each session and should be ready to participate knowledgeably and constructively in class activities.

2. Students are expected to be present when class begins, remain throughout the session, and to hand in all assignments on time.

3. In accordance with the Indiana University School of Social Work grading policy, students must earn at least a "C" to pass this course.

4. Consistent with the School’s academic policy, a formal evaluation of the course and its instructor will be completed at the end of the course,

5. Students are expected to respect the opinions and feelings of other students, the instructor and guest speakers, even though they may differ from their own.

6. Academic dishonesty (including cheating on exams and plagiarism in papers) is not consistent with ethical conduct in social work practice and is unacceptable in social work classes. In cases of academic dishonesty, university guidelines will be followed. Any student caught cheating or plagiarizing (offering the work of someone else as one's own) will fail the course. Failure of a required social work course will result in automatic dismissal from the social work program. A student's right to appeal such dismissal is outlined in materials distributed at student orientation meetings.

To avoid plagiarism, credit sources whenever you use someone else's language or ideas. Such crediting must be detailed and specific. Simply including a work in your list of references is insufficient. You must specifically acknowledge a source each time you use that source, paragraph by paragraph, even sentence by sentence, as necessary. See the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th edition) for in-text, online and electronic media references.

Grading

If you are participating in any honors program please discuss you needs with the instructor early in the semester!

1. Annotated websites: 100 points max.

2. Reaction Paper: 50 points max.

3. Position Proposal: 200 points max.

4. Grant Proposal: 250 points max.

5. Two examinations: 200 points each
max.

 

Grading Scale:

A+ 975-1000 B+ 875-899 C+ 775-799 D+ 675-699 F <600
A 925-974 B 825-874 C 725-774 D 625-674  
A- 900-924 B- 800-824 C- 700-724 D- 600-624  

 

Grading Criteria for Papers

Effective generalist social work practice requires good writing skills to communicate information accurately and concisely to others involved in helping client systems. For this reason, formal writing assignments in social work courses will be evaluated both for the content and ideas presented and for the clarity of that presentation. The grade for a paper will be based on the following criteria:

I. Presentation and Appearance

A. Neatness

B. Correct grammar
(noun-verb agreement, sentence structure, proper and consistent verb tense, etc.)

C. Use of non-sexist language

D. Spelling

E. Punctuation

F. Correct usage of APA style

II. Organization

A. Structure and format of the paper

B. Logical sequencing and continuity of ideas

C. Clarity of expression

D. Conciseness

III. Content as indicated by specific paper assignment

  1. Originality of though
  2. Cogency of argument
  3. Match with assignment

Standards:

All papers, including the web assignments, will be word-processed or typed and paginated. Text must be double spaced and in ten point type with one inch margins on the top, bottom, and left hand sides. Use a two inch margin on the right to provide room for comments. APA citation style is to be used, including in-text references and the bibliography. APA manuals are available at the bookstore and would be a valuable resource in your library.

 

Note:

For a brief reference on how to cite electronic materials visit:

Electronic Reference Formats Recommended by the American Psychological Association

http://www.apa.org/journals/webref.html

Helpful software programs are also available for writing in APA style. Most work in tandem with common word-processors.

You can download a free demonstration version of one directly from the APA website:

http://calkins.apa.org/apa-style/demo.cfm.

Students experiencing writing difficulties are advised to seek assistance at the University Writing Center in Room 427 of Cavanaugh Hall. Please call 274-2049 to schedule an appointment or drop by to pick up some available written handouts. If you really get in a pinch, call the Grammar Hotline at 274-3000.

 

Students with Special Needs

In compliance with ADA guidelines, students who have any condition, either permanent or temporary, that might affect their ability to perform in this class are encouraged to inform the instructor at the beginning of the term. Adaptations of teaching methods and class materials, including text and reading materials or testing, will be made as needed to provide equitable participation.

 

Appointments, Office Location, Telephone Number

My office is in ES 4149. I am available for drop in appointments during office hours. If this is inconvenient or if you wish to have a private conversation, feel free to schedule an appointment. My office phone number is 317-274-6717. The easiest way to reach me is through email at rvernon@iupui.edu.

 

Bibliography:

Abramovitz, M. (1988). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston, MA: South End Press.

Austin, D. (1988). The political economy of human services programs. New York, NY: JAI Press.

Axinn, J., & Levin, H. (1992). Social welfare: A history of the American response to need (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.

Beverly, D. and McSweeny, E. (1987). Social welfare and social justice Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Boulding, K. (1967). The boundaries of social policy. Social Work. 12, (1), 3-11.

Bowe, F. (1993). Access to the information age: Fundamental decisions in elecommunications policy. Policy Studies Journal. 21, (4), 765-774.

Bremner, R. (1994). American Philanthropy, University of Chicago Press.

Burch, H. A. (1996). Basic social policy and planning: Strategies and practice methods. New York: Haworth Press.

Burns, E. (1956). Social security and public policy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hall.

Burstein, P. (1991). Policy Domains: Organization, Culture and Policy Outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327-50

Cates, J. (1984). Insuring inequality Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Chambers, Donald E. (1993). Policy and social programs. (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan

Chapin, R. (1995). Social policy development: the strengths perspective. Social work,40, (4), 506-514.

Cleveland, H. (1985a). The twilight of hierarchy: Speculations on the global information society. Public Administration Review, 45, 195-195.

Danziger, S., Haveman, R. and Plotnick, R. (1981) How income transfer programs affect work, savings, and the income distribution. Journal of Economic Literature 19, 975-1028.

de Leon, P. (1992). The democratization of the policy sciences. Public administration review. 52, (2), 125-129

de Leon, P. (1994). Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future. Policy sciences, 27, 77-95.

DiNitto, D. (1995). Social welfare: Politics and public policy. (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.

Dobelstein, A. W. (1996). Social welfare: policy and analysis. (2nd ed.). Chicago, Ill: Nelson Hall Publishers.

Dogoff, R. (1981). Clinicians as social policy makers. Social Casework, 17, 284-292.

 

Duncan, G. & Brooks-Gunn (eds.) (1997). Consequences of growing up poor, Russell Sage Foundation.

Durning, D. (1993). Participatory policy analysis in a social agency: a case study. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 297-322.

Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. New York, NY: Crown.

Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1987). Confronting values in policy analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Flynn, J. (1992) Social agency policy: Analysis and presentation for community Practice. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

Flynn, J. (1990). Using the computer to teach and learn social policy: A report from the classroom and the field. Computers in Human Services, 5, 199-209.

Flynn, J. (1987). Simulating policy processes through electronic mail. Computers in Human Services, 2, (1/2), 13-26.

Frey, G. (1987). Toward a conceptual framework for policy-related practice. Paper presented at the Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting, St. Louis, MO.

Gil, D., (1976). Unraveling social policy. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

Gilbert, N. (1983). Capitalism and the welfare state. New Haven: Yale

Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (1998). Dimensions of social welfare policy (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA; Allyn & Bacon.

Graham, H. (1990). The civil rights era: Origins and development of national policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

 

Gordon, L. (1994). Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890-1935, New York, NY: Free Press.

Gurnack, A and Harty, S. (1987). The emergence of policy implementation analysis: The Wyatt v. Stickney decision international. Journal of Public Administration, 9, (4).

Harrison, D. and Hoshino, G. (1984). Britain's Berkley report: Lessons for the United States. Social Work, 29.

Hart, A. F. (1989). Teaching policy to clinical master's students: An historical approach. Journal of Teaching Social Work, 3, (2), 35-45.

Haskett, G. T. (1990). Social policy in schools of social work: Preparation for advocacy? Paper presented at the 1990 Annual program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Reno, NV.

Haynes, K. and Mickelson, H. (1999). Affecting change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn Bacon.

Heffernan, W.J. (1992). Social welfare policy: A research and action strategy. New York, NY: Longman.

Hidalgo, T. L. & Woodman Peterson, N. J. (1985). Lesbian and gay issues: A resource manual for social workers. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers

Hirschhorn, L. (1977). Social Policy and the Life Cycle: A Developmental Perspective. Social Service Review, 434-450.

Huff, D. & Johnson, D. (May, 1993). "Phantom welfare: public relief for corporate america," Social Work, 311-316.

Hyde, C. H. (1994). Commitment to social change: Voices from the feminist movement. Journal of Community Practice, 1(2),45-64.

Jansson, B. S. (1990). Social welfare policy: From theory to practice. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.

Jansson, B. S. (1999). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.

Kahn, A. (1979). Social policy and social services. (2nd ed). New York, NY: Random House.

Karger, H. J. & Stoesz, D. (1998). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach. New York: Longman.

Kilty, K. and Meenaghan, T. (1995). Social work and the convergence of science and politics. Social work, 40, (4), 445-455.

Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and public policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

Meyer, C. (1995). The bell curve and other omens. Affillia Journal of Women and Social Work, 10, (2), 117.

McNutt, J. (1995). National Information Infrastructure Policy as the Social Policy of the Next Century: An Empowerment Perspective. Paper presented at the 1995 Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Diego, CA.

Morris, R. (1985). The social policy of the American welfare state New York, NY : Longmans.

Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Omer, S (1978). Social development. International Social Work. 22, 3-11.

Popple, P. R., & Leighninger, L. (1998). The policy-based profession: An introduction to social welfare policy for social workers. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Prigmore, C. and Atherton, C. (1986). Social welfare policy: Analysis and formulation (2nd ed.). Lexington: D.C. Heath .

Raheim, S. and Bolden, J. (1995). Economic empowerment of low income women through self-employment programs. Affillia Journal of Women and Social Work, 10, (2), 138-145.

Sabatier, P. (1991). Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. PS. [June] 147-156.

Segal, E. and Brzuzy, S. (1995). Gender and congressional voting: A legislative analysis. Affillia Journal of Women and Social Work, 10, (1), 8-16.

Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. Armon, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Skocpol, T. and Amenta, E. (1986). States and social policies. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 131-57.

Skocpol, T. (1995). Social policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Smith, H. (1988). The power game: How Washington works. New York: Random House.

Social Work Speaks, 5th Edition:. NASW Policy Statements, 2000-2003. NASW Press

Sunley, R. (1983). Advocating today: A human service practitioner's handbook. New York, NY: Family Services Association of America.

Titmuss, R. (1974). Social policy: An introduction. London: Allen and Unwin.

Tropman, J. (1989). American values and social welfare. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Webber, H., (June, 1995). "The Failure of Health Care Reform" Social Service Review, 309-322

Weisbrod, D. (1988). Non-profit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Van Soest, D. (1994). Strange benefellows: A call for reordering national priorities from three social justice perspectives. Social Work, 39, (6), 710-717

Zippay, A. (1995, March). The politics of empowerment. Social Work, 40 (2), 263-67.

Ziter, M. (1983). Social Policy Practice: Tasks and Skills. Administration in Social Work, 7, 37-50.